[New-imc] clariication,

[Shayne O'Neill]

Was just throwing that out there btw. not tying it to the other proposal
:)

Just thought that it was apropriate to bring up as we are talking process
change.

------------------------------------
"Must not Sleep! Must warn others!"
-Aesop.
Shayne O'Neill. Indymedia. Fun.
http://www.perthimc.asn.au

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Shayne O'Neill wrote:

>
> Would it be worth also introducing the 3 month trial concept as a
> standard idea , or see how it plays out with qc first?
>
> I think the 3 months of more intensive mentoring and evaluation (to weed
> out dud imcs) is an idea worth its time. the debris of failed imcs down
> the sidebar is a testament to this.
>
> ------------------------------------
> "Must not Sleep! Must warn others!"
> -Aesop.
> Shayne O'Neill. Indymedia. Fun.
> http://www.perthimc.asn.au
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Mike R wrote:
>
> > Hi clara & Bart,
> >
> > There is no urgency on the proposal & we can extend the deadline.  how
> > is
> >
> >  DEADLINE Wed 28 Jan 2004 17:00 GMT
> >
> > ??
> >
> > Also, the proposal won't change much but will prevent a working group
> > member from rushing through a personal application.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > Thursday, January 08, 2004, 5:16:31 AM, clara said:
> >
> > c> i support this,
> >
> > c> but in general I think that proposal that doesn't have an immediate urgency
> > c> should have a deadline of at least a week.
> >
> > c> love and solidarity,
> > c> clara
> >
> >
> > c> At 01:07 8-1-2004, Mike R wrote:
> > >>Reviewing the message trail of how the sf.indymedia.org proposal
> > >>passed
> > >>http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2003-November/004633.html
> > >>it did pass ususually.  There was no declared sponsor for the
> > >>collective.  The new-imc working group member who championed it was
> > >>Gekked, who is a member of the new applying collective.  He set the
> > >>deadline and also sent the message to imc-process that the proposed
> > >>imc passed.
> > >>
> > >>In order to avoid this sort of conflict of interest in the future, I
> > >>propose that all IMC application have a sponsor who is not a member of
> > >>the applying collective.
> > >>
> > >>This is a forward-looking proposal and cannot apply retroactively.
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>  Mike
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> > >>New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> > >>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike
> > mailto:micro.zen at verizon.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> > New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> > http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>