[New-imc] Sketch of the proposal to IMC Valparaiso

[ana]

Hi all,

i agree with clara that this is a major improvement. I still have a few 
concerns. Please see response below.

clara wrote:

>(...)Dear Rosa,
>
>thank you very much for this proposal. I think it is an excellent 
>approach to the problem.
>
>Rosa de la Boca wrote:
>
>  
>
>>[...]
>> 
>>
>>- IMC Valparaiso will actively seek more outreach in the group, by, for 
>>instance, contacting minorities movements in Valparaiso and inviting 
>>them to take part in the IMC.
>>
>>    
>>
ana says:
it would be helpful if they had a relation of what movements, groups, 
they are going to contact. I'm not asking for an extensive list to be 
sent here, but an assertion that they are already working on that. imc 
valparaiso should feel free to use wiki for that.

But please see comment below, which i think it is more serious...

>>- IMC Valparaiso will recognize that work division is an issue 
>>and constantly seek to improve it (see Mike’s comments - 
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2004-May/005156.html )
>>
>>- IMC Valparaiso will discuss periodically these issues in its meetings, 
>>e.g. in a monthly basis
>>
>>- IMC Valparaiso will send within three months a report of what has been 
>>done in this area. If three months after the approval of the proposal 
>>IMC Valparaiso doesn’t comply with these requirements, its affiliation 
>>to the network may be cancelled by the imc-process group. We will ask 
>>the help of other IMCs in Chile to assist them and to verify if these 
>>recommendations are being followed.
>>- This proposal may be blocked or amended by IMC Valparaiso itself, if 
>>they don’t agree with it. If no one blocks the proposal, IMC Valparaiso 
>>will be considered approved in imc-process.
>>
>>    
>>
ana says:

May be blocked by imc valparaiso?? this proposal should have come from 
imc valparaiso themselves, in my opinion. At least, it should have been 
discussed on their list first, before sending it here. It is an 
important process issue; proposals of this seriousness should not come 
from individuals without previous consultation *and* agreement with the 
group. (or am i missing something?)

>>- Deadline: one week from its presentation
>>
>>    
>>
I think the point of consensus among imc valparaiso should be put 
forward before aiming for any deadline.

I may sound harsh but i don't mean it; i am into the process, not the 
people or persons involved on it. I do understand that helping a new imc 
has its pressures and it means work; i have been there myself and i have 
made my mistakes too.

Rosa I really appreciate that you are going to translate this, thanks 
for being the 'liaison' for this.

best

-- 
ana. uk. london.
www.indymedia.org.uk
--------------
public key/llave publica:
http://docs.indymedia.org/twiki/pub/Main/AnaPena/anita.asc