[New-imc] Online form: Proposed new IMC! (Salt Lake Indymedia)

Mike Rosenberg micro.zen at verizon.net
Tue May 25 07:08:00 PDT 2004


Pseudo Punk <bart at indymedia.org> wrote:
__________
>evan <evan at protest.net> wrote:
>> I have a few questions that we need to make sure we ask these guys. The 
>> first is if they have been in contact or worked with the existing Utah 
>> IMC. I know the Utah IMC is based in Salt Lake City so this would be 
>> two imc's in the same place. To be honest i'm not sure how active the 
>> Utah imc has been lately. Clearly this request comes out of frustration 
>> with the editorial policy or frequency of features by the existing 
>> collective.
>
>i really doubt utah imc is active.
>i've upgraded their site a couple of days ago & it seemed their latest
>feature is from september 03. (i mailed their techlist & after 2 months i
>got no reply).
>
>so i think it's dead. maybe they can use that site if they want ?
>does anyone know someone from that old group ?
>Bart

I agree. If the current Utah collective has become defunct & this group passes New-IMC, they should have the option of taking over the current website.  Salt Lake City is just one area within Utah; however, much of the UtahIMC media I've read or listened to was done in SLC.

The little I know about the area, as the state capitol and home to a university, it is a more culturally and politically diverse area than the rest of the state (that is relative to one of the most hegemonous and conservative states in the US).

The old Utah collective produced some really good material. It's sad to see them go defunct. But it is exciting to see a new group that could possibly replace them.

-mike




More information about the New-imc mailing list