[Seattle-editorial] Re: Amnesty International calls Palestinian attacks oncivilians"crimesagainst humanity"

[anarch3m]

There are two possibilities to this word.  

those who are spreading disinformation and acting as if they were Israeli so as to discredit Jews of all beliefs and actions.

The other possibility is those who are Jewish, are pro Israel, and who want to use any and all means to remove others from the area.  This would include the documented cases (BBC of drunk soldiers talking about the joys of buldozing ocupioed homes.  This would include the israeli soldiers whose flackjacket bears the words "born to kill" and also the checkpoint troops who cause women in ambulances to see their babies die at birth because they were held up from the trip to a hospital.  

I do not adhere to the theory that two wrongs are thus right (vengance for vengance- moral relativism)  Two of my children have Jewish Godparents.  I have no bias against the religion, nor the culture.  

Give me a better term form the fact that many Jews have become the abuser who once terrorized them. No group is perfect.  No group is completely evil.  I don't like suicide bombers.  I don't like brutality by Jews.

Is this unacceptable a position?

Sorry if I used a term that was too hot for you.  The word has become common.  And it's not because of the Palestinians.
--

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:10:48  
 David F. Skoll wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2002,  anarch3m wrote:
>
>> We get Zionazi crap.
>
>You lost me here.  I don't care to hold a dialog with people who use
>words like that.
>
>--
>David.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>


_____________________________________________________
Supercharge your e-mail with a 25MB Inbox, POP3 Access, No Ads
and NoTaglines --> LYCOS MAIL PLUS.
http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus