[Seattle-editorial] November 30th 2002

brady at riseup.net brady at riseup.net
Mon Nov 18 04:57:32 PST 2002


Hey Seattle IMC,

OK, so, I have a proposal for an N30 feature on the webpage.

Since a "week of action" has been called, it seems to follow logic that there 
will be "building actions" all week, "building" media hype for n30. I would 
propose that on or around November 23rd, a feature go up, to highlight and 
advertise any/all affinity group actions that take place. This way people can 
be inspired, and informed about actions.

What do ya think?

I can help write any stuff that needs to be for the summary.

-brady mcgarry-
http://seattleacc.cjb.net
http://riseup.net/n30


Quoting Lance Larkin <inzimbabwe at yahoo.com>:

> Hello,
> 
> I can understand Geov's wanting to cover our cities
> gearing up for a 'fight'. Reporting on the reaction by
> the state to these protests is important. However,
> much of our coverage on this event in the past has
> focused on the police and media reaction. Scroll down
> to see the appropriate features at:
> http://seattle.indymedia.org/features.php3?feature_id=7
> and http://seattle.indymedia.org/feature-feb01.html
> 
> This should be a part of the coverage, but I agree
> with Walt. Our coverage should expand beyond the 'they
> report on the police keeping "order"/we report on
> violence the police do and the miserable corporate
> media coverage'.
> 
> Our volunteers have done some amazing work in the past
> regarding the link to police violence and corporate
> power. However, it would be nice to see some articles
> on how the movement has progressed since 1999
> (critique as well as supportive, different tactics,
> etc) or perhaps some coverage on how the protests have
> affected policy since then.
> 
> Just some ideas,
> Lance
> 
> ---  anarch3m <anarch3m at lycos.com> wrote:
> > Brady, I share your sentiments.  I read how the anti
> > wto and the anti war movements in europe are joining
> > for actions of dissent.  Perhaps this can happen
> > here.
> > 
> > In any case re N30, I don't know what Parvish has in
> > mind, we might latter communicate...
> > 
> > Personally I see no need to recreate the stopage of
> > the WTO meeting every anniversary.  And would like
> > to see something else.  I hope that other aspects
> > will get coverage, but we all need to make sure it
> > happens.
> > 
> > Your further input is certainly of interest to me
> > and I hope others
> > 
> > walt
> > sea imc ed collective, as an individual
> > 
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:44:15  
> >  brady wrote:
> > >Hey there Seattle IMC,
> > >
> > >Wondering what (if any) plan you folks have for
> > coverage as far as N30 goes this
> > >year. Geov emailed me briefly this morning, and it
> > sounds like he wants to focus
> > >on the city picking a fight. 
> > >
> > >Since the model that has been adopted for
> > organizing n30 this year really does
> > >avoid police confrontation, wondering what you
> > thought.
> > >
> > >I am at your service.
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Seattle-editorial mailing list