[Seattle-editorial] Proposal: Who are active editorial members?

[Gentry Lange]

1. I propose that an active Editorial List be put together (If there is one
and I don't know about it, where is it?)

2. I propose that Judy, Joseph, and Jason Reep be added to the active member
list in addition to those mentioned by Jonathan below

3a. I propose a meeting of active editors, to be held at the IMC on every
Tuesday from 5:30-6:00 in the coming month, and that we recruit new members
to show up for those meetings online. Starting on the first Tuesday after
labor day.

3b. Alternative Proposal to 3a: All active editors who can't show to
meetings get a messenger account or free messenger account which is
compatable and participate in meetings online at appointed times.

3c. Alt Prop to 3a and 3b, stories are approved according to our
silence=consent for new proposals at a faster pace, say 12 hours, instead of
24.

4. I propose that active members who get this email that are not mentioned,
but who I have neglected to mention, show up at these meetings, or suggest
another evening to do it, or ammend or alter my proposals, or respond (as I
am concerned with Jason Reep's Previous Email, and wonder if other people
are simply not active anymore? or if their accounts have been suspended)

Gentry Lange

-----Original Message-----
From: jl at u.washington.edu [mailto:jl at u.washington.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Gentry Lange
Cc: sgleason at futurenet.org; jasonr at speakeasy.net
Subject: Re: Who are active editorial members?



Active editors are at least: me, you, Susan, Jeremy, Jason, possibly Walt.

You and I are definitely two thumbs up, so we only need one more.

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Gentry Lange wrote:

> How many do we have left? Who's left to timely approve newswire items? And
> since we both proposed the same story, doesn't that tacitly mean the story
> is approved by two active editors?
>
> Gentry
>
>