[Seattle-editorial] Proposal: Who are active editorial members?

[Jeremy G Kahn]

FYI, regarding bounce information:

The bounce information is actually pretty good. Members get notified 
about once a week; you can read about the basics here:

http://www.esosoft.com/support/mailinglist/mailman/bounce.html

I wouldn't sweat it much. I sent an email to the current members who 
were recently bounced just in case.


Regarding the active list, and a meeting -- I think this is a good idea.

I would also support quick-and-dirty selection of articles as a 
front-page turnover assist -- provided we choose articles that have 
"hook" first paragraphs and can then link to the rest of the article.

I wish we were on a better codebase so this would be a point-and-click 
operation....

-jeremy




Gentry Lange wrote:

>1. I propose that an active Editorial List be put together (If there is one
>and I don't know about it, where is it?)
>
>2. I propose that Judy, Joseph, and Jason Reep be added to the active member
>list in addition to those mentioned by Jonathan below
>
>3a. I propose a meeting of active editors, to be held at the IMC on every
>Tuesday from 5:30-6:00 in the coming month, and that we recruit new members
>to show up for those meetings online. Starting on the first Tuesday after
>labor day.
>
>3b. Alternative Proposal to 3a: All active editors who can't show to
>meetings get a messenger account or free messenger account which is
>compatable and participate in meetings online at appointed times.
>
>3c. Alt Prop to 3a and 3b, stories are approved according to our
>silence=consent for new proposals at a faster pace, say 12 hours, instead of
>24.
>
>4. I propose that active members who get this email that are not mentioned,
>but who I have neglected to mention, show up at these meetings, or suggest
>another evening to do it, or ammend or alter my proposals, or respond (as I
>am concerned with Jason Reep's Previous Email, and wonder if other people
>are simply not active anymore? or if their accounts have been suspended)
>
>Gentry Lange
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jl at u.washington.edu [mailto:jl at u.washington.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:38 PM
>To: Gentry Lange
>Cc: sgleason at futurenet.org; jasonr at speakeasy.net
>Subject: Re: Who are active editorial members?
>
>
>
>Active editors are at least: me, you, Susan, Jeremy, Jason, possibly Walt.
>
>You and I are definitely two thumbs up, so we only need one more.
>
>On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Gentry Lange wrote:
>
>  
>
>>How many do we have left? Who's left to timely approve newswire items? And
>>since we both proposed the same story, doesn't that tacitly mean the story
>>is approved by two active editors?
>>
>>Gentry
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>  
>