[Seattle-editorial] still awaiting response to <<<<<<<<PROPOSE TO HIDE>>>>>>>>

[Lance Larkin]

Walt and all,

Someone has already responded with a good argument for
not hiding:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/seattle-editorial/2003-February/002888.html

According to our policy this means a NO hide unless
there is more debate. I tend to agree with Jonathan.
Why hide it? If you want add a comment to it (not
necessarily as an editorial member), go for it. Light
touch on the editorializing, remember?

Lance

---  anarch3m <anarch3m at lycos.com> wrote:
>
http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=22043&group=webcast
> 
> One came in, it said this should be hid, since the
> poster ids it with the imc
> 
> Anybody else care, ,,, enough to say yes or no???


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com