[Seattle-editorial] please remove

[Jason Reep]

http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=29944&group=webcast
hidden.


I read the NYC policy and I like it. I would be interested in discussion of a more moderate-ive approach if the safety/usefullness clauses in the ed. policy need more aggressive guarding.  I don't think that our policy would need to change to accomplish that.  I don't know what to say to the folks who think that any hiding is censorship.  I greatly appreciate those who take the time to comment on 'National Alliance' type posts.

-jason



anarch3m wrote:

>duplicate posting at:
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=29944&group=webcast
>of the orriginal at:
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=29941&group=webcast
>
>I can no longer monitor the wire as the password has been changed.
>
>Is ANYONE doing the equivalent of the "wire clerk" duties for the Seattle site?  I have seen no move to "respond" to National Alliance postings (etc), other than by myself, Bruce and some other, new and unknown online names.
>
>I know...."what's National Alliance?"........
>
>FYI:
>http://www.nyc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=65071&group=webcast
>
>excerpt: 
>
>When May A Post Be Hidden?
>
>An “open publishing” system is founded, fundamentally, on trust. The editors of and participants in this project trust that other participants will use the newswire to publish news, or, at the least, intelligent and insightful commentary. But as New York Indymedia’s popularity has grown, so has the abuse of our open publishing system. Some of the abuse seems to be juvenile in nature; some it amounts to a deliberate attempt to destroy the project. What’s more, an unsystematic and scattershot moderation policy may have confused other readers, who might not be aware of what constitutes abuse and what constitutes news.
>
>The New York IMC editorial collective, in order to maintain the integrity of the newswire and the media commons it creates for our community of participants, may "hide" posts to the Newswire when the content disregards the guidelines that have been put in place (see below).
>
>**********end of excerpt
>
>As some local members regard the open access policy to mean we are powerless to control what comes in the door, others continue to interpret any hides as censorship and ispso facto verboten.  This disregards a growing body of evidence that the site/space are on the way to becoming less than welcoming.
>
>Well, only those who still spend time in the space, and in the online debates, and ask "why not" of those who don't use indy have a clue, or so it seems.
>
>disgruntled walt
>
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
>http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>  
>