[Seattle-editorial] Feature proposal: FCC
Jeremy Kahn
jgk at fifthhorseman.net
Sun May 4 16:16:56 PDT 2003
yes again. Good work as usual, jonathan.
--jeremy
jonathan lawson wrote:
> subtitle: MEDIA EMPIRES SET TO CONSOLIDATE
> title: Powell sets June 2 as D(eregulation)-Day for the FCC
>
> On June 2, <a href="
> http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/05/01/9304538">the
> FCC plans to vote</a> on whether to "relax" the rules for owning
> American news media. For months, an expanding media democracy
> movementhas produced an unprecedented amount of public opposition to
> FCC chair Michael Powell's proposed deregulation, as well as growing,
> bipartisan Congressional pressure for greater transparency and more
> public debate. (In Washington, Representatives <a
> href="http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/03/08/3895513">Inslee</a>
> and <a href="http://www.zverina.com/2003/0307.htm">McDermott</a> have
> spoken out against Powell's plans, and Senators <a
> href="http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/04/11/6601584">
> Cantwell</a> and <a href="
> http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/04/16/8011413">Murray</a>
> have called for more Congressional oversight before a decision is
> made. Despite all this, Powell has <a
> href="http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/05/01/4062870">refused
> to reveal</a> the specifics of his proposed changes until after the
> June 2 vote. If the FCC decides to allow further media concentration,
> the resulting stampede of megamergers would give a shrinking handful
> of large, politically conservative corporations even greater influence
> over what is reported--or ignored--in the news. The public's ability
> to have open, informed discussion with a wide variety of viewpoints
> would be even further compromised.
>
> <p>There is still time to <a
> href="http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=26571">take
> action</a>. Write to Congress and the FCC <a
> href="http://capwiz.com/consumersunion/issues/alert/?alertid=1656736&type=CO">here</a>,
> urging greater transparency, further Congressional inquiry and more
> time for public comment. On Sat. May 31 at the old Ballard Safeway
> (5710 22nd Ave NW), a group of Seattle artist/activists will host <a
> href="http://www.zverina.com/2003/0531.htm"> Weapons of Mass
> Distraction</a>, a multimedia event drawing attention to the FCC
> rulemaking.
>
> <p><a
> href="http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=26802">Another
> shadow over media diversity in Seattle</a> is the daily newspapers'
> fight over the future of their <a
> href="http://www.nwguild.org/JOA">Joint Operating Agreement</a>. While
> Seattle Times majority owner Frank Blethen has been an outspoken
> critic of media deregulation, the Hearst Corporation (owners of the
> Post-Intelligencer) has for years lobbied for loosening of the rules,
> particularly the <a href="
> http://www.reclaimthemedia.org/stories.php?story=03/03/31/4775680">cross-ownership
> ban</a>.
>
> <p><a href="http://www.reclaimthemedia.org">Reclaim the Media</a> | <a
> href="http://www.mediareform.net">Free Press</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seattle-editorial mailing list
> Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
More information about the Seattle-editorial
mailing list