[Seattle-editorial] Life for Confession? The Ridgway Plea Bargain

Sun Nov 9 09:37:14 PST 2003

Kirsten,

You should learn how to post your own feature... can you make it this
Tuesday anytime 5-8pm? Or any other time this week? Or I can meet up with
you to show you how it's done, or just email me directly and we can set a
time to meet with maybe one or two other active editors.

Gentry

-----Original Message-----
From: seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org
[mailto:seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org]On Behalf Of
anarch3m
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 2:16 AM
To: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org; sheelanagig at juno.com
Subject: Re: [Seattle-editorial] Life for Confession? The Ridgway Plea
Bargain

yes...don't get me started..
my wife witnessed a court apointed "defender" hustling back and forth from
client to prosecutor while the 'defendant"/victim sat the afternoon away
waiting her moment before the judge.  It was all like a car salesman's ploy,
arrainging a "good price" on the car...

I wouldn't, and you wouldn't have "freely" set for this in a car salesroom.
But it happens hundreds of times daily in the halls of justice.  They often
sell it as 'more convenient," since you don't have to sweat through
testimony and deliberations.  You can be on your way sooner...
--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:17:52
From: sheelanagig at juno.com
To: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
Cc:

>Proposed article -
>
>
>SUMMARY -
>
><P>The judge in the Ridgway case asked Ridgway if he was entering into
>this plea bargain of free will. Ridgway said "yes."
>The judge then asked if anyone had coerced or threatened Ridgway to make
>him accept the plea bargain, and Ridgway answered "no." Yet he was
>threatened with loss of his life, with the death penalty. HIS LIFE WAS
>THREATENED by prosecutors, and if he agreed to the plea bargain, his life
>was not threatened any longer. Additionally, the Green River Task Force
>admits to interrogating him up to 14 hours a day for months. The Task
>Force also said that "getting him to confess was hardest of all."
>
>*******************************************************
><P>Life for Confessions? The Ridgway Plea Bargain
><BR>by Kirsten Anderberg Copyright 2003
>
><P>I am no legal analyst. I am just a person examining the local news.
>But I have a problem with the American criminal justice system's tactics.
>As I watched the television coverage of the courtroom which held Gary L.
>Ridgway during his confession and plea bargain this week, I had troubles
>with the implications of some of the court's questioning of Ridgway. To
>accept a plea bargain, the court does a little song and dance where it
>has the defendant say out loud that s/he agrees to waive all rights to an
>appeal or any revisiting of the issue, that the defendant enters into the
>plea bargain of free will, and that the defendant understands what s/he
>just agreed to. I call it a song and dance because many people who fall
>victim to an underfunded public defender system, and are bullied by
>threats of inflated criminal charges from the prosecutor, plead guilty to
>crimes, crimes they never committed, strictly out of fear of getting lost
>in the justice system, not out of truth and justice. The disproportionate
>rate of black males incarcerated is a good place to start looking for
>these "free will" plea bargains gone awry. I also find it interesting
>that low-income defendants, people who have to accept court-appointed
>attorneys or public defenders, agree to plea bargains at overwhelming
>rates, compared to defendants who hire private attorneys. I think it is
>shameful that prosecutors rely on the plea bargain system in the way they
>do. I still think all plea bargained guilty pleas are suspect, since none
>of them are truly made of free will. Virtually all of them are made under
>duress, under threats by the prosecutor against their freedom and
>sometimes their lives, how is that free will? No contract that involved
>money would be allowed to stand under those conditions. Contracts require
>an arm's length bargaining. Plea bargains are lacking an arm's length
>bargaining. Aren't human lives as important as business and money in
>contracts?
>
><P>The judge in the Ridgway case asked Ridgway if he was entering into
>this plea bargain of free will. Ridgway said "yes."
>The judge then asked if anyone had coerced or threatened Ridgway to make
>him accept the plea bargain, and Ridgway answered "no." Yet I can see
>that is not completely true. First of all, he was threatened with loss of
>his life, with the death penalty. HIS LIFE WAS THREATENED by prosecutors,
>and if he agreed to the plea bargain, his life was not threatened any
>longer. Additionally, the Green River Task Force admits to interrogating
>him up to 14 hours a day for months. The Task Force also said that
>"getting him to confess was hardest of all." And they said it was "a game
>of psychology and control." So, let me review this. The Green River Task
>Force is on television saying it interrogated Ridgway up to 14 hours a
>day, had a really hard time getting him to confess, and played
>psychological control games on him, and then a judge ACCEPTS him saying
>he was not coerced into the plea bargained confession? I would say LOGIC
>argues that he was actually coerced by the Green River Task Force and
>prosecutors, he was told he would be sentenced to death, most probably,
>or he could agree to a confession and a plea bargain to save his life.
>How on earth is that not coersion and threats?
>
><P>I am not saying that Ridgway is innocent, and I am not saying I have
>all the remedies for the rotting American criminal justice system. It is
>sad that one of the most popular tactics prosecutors use to get a guilty
>plea, a tactic used on a mass scale, is plea bargaining. Plea bargains
>are inherently borne of coersion and threats. Threats of puffed-up
>criminal charges, threats of public defenders that are too busy to even
>speak with frightened defendants before the day of hearings, a scary
>system that swallows a defendant when s/he is criminally charged, a "game
>of psychology and control," to use the words of the Green River Task
>Force, is used whether you committed the crime or not, as a suspect! I
>doubt Ridgway would have confessed to those crimes if he was not offered
>a "bargain" where he plead what the prosecutors asked for, and in return,
>they spared his life. The Green River Murderer was doomed. Getting off
>with life in prison, not death, was worth any confession, definitely.
>But, his case is a good example of how meaningless the words recited in
>courtrooms across the nation are when it comes to free will and plea
>bargains.
>
><P>The police themselves said they interrogated Gary Ridgway for up to 14
>hours a day for months. What would you do under those conditions? They
>bragged that it was really hard to wrangle a confession out of him, and
>that they played games of mind control with him. So how does that mesh
>with Ridgway's "free will" guilty plea? I understand it is a neat and
>tidy way to end this, but it is not really an honest, uncohersed
>confession by any stretch. It is a BARGAINED guilty plea, and I still
>think this system is flawed, even if it ends up with the desired result.
>Maybe no one cares about this, since Ridgway killed enough women to
>warrant no sympathy regarding a fair criminal processing. Maybe what I
>would consider light torture, 14 hours a day of questioning by cops, does
>not matter, since it was used on Ridgway, and he deserves anything he
>gets. So we throw out all the rules in consensus on really bad people?
>Could you or I be jailed as a suspect, and then be legally questioned for
>14 hours a day, for months, in Tacoma, Wa., with cop mind games, getting
>a confession out of you that was "hard" to get? Did Ridgway have the
>option of refusing the 14 hours of questioning a day? What precedence
>does that set? The end result is he is in jail for life, so it is fine.
>But the process that put him there is flawed, in my opinion, even if it
>was on a case as heinous as the Green River Murder case.
>
>
>
>
>
>*************************************************************************
>*********************
>For near-daily political ramblings from Kirsten, visit her blog at
>www.kanderberg.blogspot.com
>or go to her writing website at www.kirstenanderberg.com
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
>The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
>Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
>Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>

____________________________________________________________
Enter now for a chance to win a 42" Plasma Television!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;6413623;3807821;f?http://mocda1.com/1/c/563632
/113422/313631/313631
AOL users go here:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;6413623;3807821;f?http://mocda1.com/1/c/563632
/113422/313631/313631
This offer applies to U.S. Residents Only
_______________________________________________
Seattle-editorial mailing list
Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial