[Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only consensus forGrouping

[anarch3m]

mea culpa?  I have signed all my work 'a3m' and not used 'ed collective'

they are not hid, they are moved to the eldest of the linked, which is the same thing in the ed interfaces vocabulary  the eldest shows them all, openly, and the a3m bached posts here keeps them easily avaialable, by topic.

Topics list

is/pal.  maybe 4 of these, plus the hid fakes by zorro

islam iraq war. except above and except Dr.Said and a poem

bolivarean revolution, chile and peru "batched for readers convenience"

newswirebraindamaged. 

all are marked a3m, which might eventually be coppied by zorro, but then the linked pieces won't leave the same traces- the "hidden" status in the interface  and their location on the front page, plus he would have to copy and paste and addendum to the senior article while actually getting them to dissappear from the que.

In defense, I thought this was the experiment and i still think it is useful to get them thematically available, clean the frontpage que to reflect the local content...plus this gets stuff more first page lifespan as there are less to push them back to page 2,3,4,...so actually less means more news

Agaion, sorry if everyomne feels i'm toooooo active.  after being told i was in the old guard its sorta funny tho.

a3m, not 3 A.M.


--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:03:40
From: Sheri Herndon <sheri at speakeasy.org>
To: g at art13.com
Cc: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org

>hi,
>in terms of accountability, we can set it up so that it will be clear to all on the working group who does what.  i think this is a good idea worth considering.  
>
>sheri
>
>>Hello? Other than Zorro's posts there's been no consensus for hiding all
>>Israel/Palestine posts, and yet that's what seems to be happening when I
>>look at the wire's hide list. In addition there's no explanation within 
>>the
>>hidden artciles which explains why they were hidden. I've also seen no
>>emails on it either.
>>
>>This action is anti-consensus, and does not jive with how we normally 
>>work
>>in the editorial group.
>>
>>Gentry
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>



____________________________________________________________
Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
http://r.hotbot.com/r/lmt_clrtn/http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/307982