[Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only consensus forGrouping

[anarch3m]

ceasing and desisting
a3m
--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:57:10
From: "Joseph Eisenschmidt" <relayer at riseup.net>
To: <seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org>
Cc: 

>Let up on that heavy hand someone. 
>
>Joseph
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org
>[mailto:seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org]On Behalf Of
>Gentry Lange
>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:24 AM
>To: typist at speakeasy.net; nathaniel t;
>seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>Subject: [Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only consensus for
>Grouping
>
>
>Hello? Other than Zorro's posts there's been no consensus for hiding all
>Israel/Palestine posts, and yet that's what seems to be happening when I
>look at the wire's hide list. In addition there's no explanation within the
>hidden artciles which explains why they were hidden. I've also seen no
>emails on it either.
>
>This action is anti-consensus, and does not jive with how we normally work
>in the editorial group.
>
>Gentry
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>



____________________________________________________________
Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
http://r.hotbot.com/r/lmt_clrtn/http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/307982