[Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only consensusforGrouping

[anarch3m]

yes, they show, in admin, as "hidden."  in fact they ARE hidden from the QUE list, the chronological come one come all scrolling ling from latest to leaving the page, but the cover points to all of them.  Its nearly like a hide but its got an arrow pointing to it parked on the front page, newer than all the linked stories, now they too are still "sort of" on the front page...even after their turn in the que would have expired.  They just get inside less real estate.  wraped labeled and more lasting too.

IMHO
--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:38:50
From: "Gentry Lange" <g at art13.com>
To: <anarch3m at lycos.com>,<seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org>,"Joseph Eisenschmidt" <relayer at riseup.net>
Cc: 

>No, no, please keep up the good work Walt. I am beyond happy that we finally
>started to deal with the wire, and didn't mean to stop your proactive
>methods. I think I am simply confused. We just need to know the answer, do
>grouped stories appear in the Admin story as hides?
>
>
>Gentry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org
>[mailto:seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org]On Behalf Of
>anarch3m
>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:46 PM
>To: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org; Joseph Eisenschmidt
>Subject: RE: [Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only
>consensusforGrouping
>
>
>ceasing and desisting
>a3m
>--
>
>--------- Original Message ---------
>
>DATE: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:57:10
>From: "Joseph Eisenschmidt" <relayer at riseup.net>
>To: <seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org>
>Cc:
>
>>Let up on that heavy hand someone.
>>
>>Joseph
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org
>>[mailto:seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org]On Behalf Of
>>Gentry Lange
>>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:24 AM
>>To: typist at speakeasy.net; nathaniel t;
>>seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>>Subject: [Seattle-editorial] No consensus for hiding, only consensus for
>>Grouping
>>
>>
>>Hello? Other than Zorro's posts there's been no consensus for hiding all
>>Israel/Palestine posts, and yet that's what seems to be happening when I
>>look at the wire's hide list. In addition there's no explanation within the
>>hidden artciles which explains why they were hidden. I've also seen no
>>emails on it either.
>>
>>This action is anti-consensus, and does not jive with how we normally work
>>in the editorial group.
>>
>>Gentry
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
>http://r.hotbot.com/r/lmt_clrtn/http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/3
>07982
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>
>



____________________________________________________________
Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
http://r.hotbot.com/r/lmt_clrtn/http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/307982