[Seattle-editorial] seven inclinations, two hides
anarch3m
anarch3m at lycos.com
Sat Oct 18 18:19:00 PDT 2003
some comments and a mea culpa are in BOLD AND AFTER THE PARTICULAR URL
a3m
--
--------- Original Message ---------
DATE: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 06:14:00
From: "nathaniel t" <vsea75 at hotmail.com>
To: seattle-editorial at indymedia.org
Cc:
>I would be inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34955&group=webcast
>
>as being clearly not news, and not useful in any other way either, but at
>least one other editor has already seen it, commented on it, and left it up,
>so I guess I'll leave it alone.
>
>I'm also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34970&group=webcast
>
>but I didn't hide that either, since it's a direct response to something an
>editor wrote.
>
>The problem with the "insurrectionary response" concept (which, by the way,
>I've always thought was a rather loose and silly use of the word
>"insurrection") is that "insurrectionary response" solicits more of the very
>crap that we object to in the first place. We're legitimizing this stuff
>and its place on our web site by engaging in a dialogue with it.
>
>I'm also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34960&group=webcast
>
>but it looks like somebody else already did.
PROBABLY ITS APPENDED TO A BATCHED STORY AND SO THEY ARE ***LISTED*** AS HIDES BY THE INTREFACE. I WOULD OBJECT TO ACTUALLY REMOVING IT FROM THE STORY AND FROM READABILITY BY ALL,
>
>I was also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34954&group=webcast
>
>for being abusive, pointless, and counterrevolutionary, and I did!
AGREED AGREED GOOD YOU DID
>
>I'm also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34933&group=webcast
>
>("I'll as soon kneecap you as blink if you think its you (God Given?) right
>to disabuse the common good. P.S. you probably belong to the objectivists
>Ayn Rand Inst, which glorifies selfishness. (It WAS founded by a sexually
>frustrated person") oh except it was written by an editor.
>
>I'm also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34929&group=webcast
>
>for being not news & generally being religious B.S., but it's a
>women's-issues post by a woman so I'll mind my own business.
>
>I was also inclined to hide
>
>http://seattle.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=34924&group=webcast
>
>for being (left-wing) content-free abusive B.S., and I did!
>
>And that's about all I can handle right now.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan
>online from McAfee.
>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>_______________________________________________
>Seattle-editorial mailing list
>Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>
____________________________________________________________
Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
http://r.hotbot.com/r/lmt_clrtn/http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/307982
More information about the Seattle-editorial
mailing list