[Seattle-editorial] Website feature about hiatus
sheri at speakeasy.org
sheri at speakeasy.net
Fri Feb 20 23:44:01 PST 2004
no waiting!
the website team is not supposed to be on a break. that was a major part of the agreement.....
so if you'd like to step that would be fabulous i'm sure!
Sheri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iamforher at riseup.net [mailto:iamforher at riseup.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 08:56 PM
> To: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> Subject: RE: [Seattle-editorial] Website feature about hiatus
>
> > Dear IMC friends,
> >
> >It looks like getting features posted is still
> like pulling teeth.
> >I'm not interested in complaining at any one
> about it. I just wonder it there's anything I
> can do?
> >What is the process for getting a feature posted?
> >Can one person just decide an article is worthy
> of being a feature and make it thus?
> >Or dose there have to be some process of getting
> a number of people to aggree on it?
> >i sugesst that if there has to be some process
> of getting people to all read and aggree on
> something then that is way ineficiant, and
> should be changed.
> >If one administrator could simply choose on
> their own to make an article a feature and then
> do it on their own things could be so much
> better.
> >I say it's well worth the risk of getting crap
> featured, to at least get some more regular
> updating of features.
>
> PS. I would be happy to be an administrator and
> help with all this. Is this possible? Or do I
> have to wait for may. If I have to wait, oh
> well.
>
> Thanks everyone for all you're up to.
> Love and peace,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >So what's new here? People saying they are going
> > to do something and not
> > doing it? The Seattle IMC is a pathetic waste of
> > time.
> >
> > Please unsubscribe me from the list... Or I guess
> > I'll probably just figure
> > out how to do it myself.
> >
> > Gentry
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org
> > [mailto:seattle-editorial-bounces at lists.indymedia.org]On
> > Behalf Of
> > rickh at riseup.net
> > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:24 PM
> > To: seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> > Subject: [Seattle-editorial] Website feature
> > about hiatus
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > 2 weeks ago, we made an agreement at the last
> > General meeting. That
> > Sunday morning, we agreed to post a feature in
> > the center of the Seattle
> > IMC webiste, detailing what the hiatus was about,
> > etc.
> >
> > More than 2 weeks have past, and this has not
> > been done. It was a
> > collective decision to do this - why is it still
> > not posted?
> >
> > Can we get it posted this week, please? Even
> > just a link to the letter
> > written would be better than nothing.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seattle-editorial mailing list
> > Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> > http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seattle-editorial mailing list
> > Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> > http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seattle-editorial mailing list
> Seattle-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-editorial
>
More information about the Seattle-editorial
mailing list