[Seattle-editorial] Re: Indy Security Issue

anarch3m anarch3m at lycos.com
Sat May 22 14:19:46 PDT 2004


Well, I did not see the post at a time where the abstract was removed and a protest note was put there.

I am the one who posted Amy Goodman in Seattle to the wire.  I am the one who sent it to the features.  And at both locations it was embeded with my own comments about the rest period.

I then found that someone had removed my editorializations....

I replaced those as a comment and thats how it appears today.

Were there other tamperings from the inside?  Whoever edited me did not have the courtesy to discuss it with me.

Perhaps its the same party to posted an anonymous gripe about me to the wire?  A gripe that had detail that needed some long history among us.
                            *****
 <<Quoting Laury <webshiva at cablespeed.com>
> This morning I discovered that someone had replaced the Amy
> Goodman 
> abstract (i.e., the summary that appears on the home page) with a
> 
> protest statement about the Seattle rest phase.  Since a 
> password was 
> needed to make this change, this is very troubling.>>
                             *****

As for not doing more during the rest.....trouble with access (f- comcast too), frustration over Meadow getting no replies to install the server I bequeathed him, constant calls from those who wanted to get Amy FOR OUR FUNDRAISING all because others whom I ask to talk with them did not carry that ball...no name at this time.....frustration over the lack of community interest as expressed by activity on the wire---oh- did I mention resuming a life with my family in the 509 which has kept me off the coast quite a bit?

As for the reimagining another IMC- ah and now Mz andenberg says SHE and others are thinking this because we the nasty editorialistas are overbearing?

WTF

four years of facing unconcerned editorialistas and once we cleared them out and it was working they SABOTAGE a working system because of whatever personal issues.

BTW  I am GLAD LAURY did not cave in to Mz A because I was starting to find her work childish and short on lournalism- almost like that of anonymous from Bellingham.  And she never replied to me either, about how to interact with us. 

Perhaps some re invision an IMC where there is nothing but talking to a choir of the like minded.  And an editorial staff standing by to rubber stamp any and all diatribes by the disaffiliated, under the rubric of alternate journalism?

No thanks to rubber stamping.

No thanks to those who alter the work of others and then remain anonymous rather than be adult about it and talk.

No thanks to re-imagining by the unemaginative who can't get a clue that over processing was the orriganal sin here.  Or who, grasping that, wish to repeat.

No thanks to collaborating with folk who I went up to and said we need to talk out our issues- who, left to take the next move, never did.  


walt aka a3m



____________________________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10


More information about the Seattle-editorial mailing list